Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Error\s+detection\s+and\s+correction\s+proposal\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: AD6E@aol.com (AD6E@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 30 15:38:17 1999
Kellys' comment gets me thinking a bit. One of the reasons SS is a favorite contest is that is actually requires sending/receiving real data. I liked it better when your birthday was part of the exch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00307.html (8,616 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: scace@uu.net (Eric Scace)
Date: Sat May 1 09:57:32 1999
This would be fun to try in a Sprint. The sending station callsign should be included in the check sequence calculation. And we can take care of paper loggers and casual participants by allowing a "b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00000.html (10,852 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Edward W. Sleight)
Date: Sat May 1 06:26:29 1999
With all due respect, that is BS. How many of us have mobile rigs? I do, but not for the reason above. That may be the justification officially given, but the pure and simple truth is it's a hobby. W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00005.html (10,747 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: K4WW@aol.com (K4WW@aol.com)
Date: Sat May 1 12:03:14 1999
<< So when you send Ed because it's short, and your real name is Bill, or Charles, you're cheating. >> Edward, since I use "BO KY" as my exchange in NAQP, or any other contest requiring a name, I sup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00006.html (7,747 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: AD6E@aol.com (AD6E@aol.com)
Date: Sat May 1 14:48:29 1999
Hi Ed, Thanks for the note (no offence taken). I often throw things out with a bit of tounge-in-cheek if only to make a point. However, I do take seriously the "backup communications" responsibility.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00008.html (12,876 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver)
Date: Sat May 1 12:08:27 1999
Yeah, but how long would a CRC period have to be to handle names like "Rumplestiltskin"? Why use error detection, anyway? It would not be that difficult to use Forward Error Correction (FEC) coding a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00009.html (7,641 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Error detection and correction proposal (score: 1)
Author: k7qq@juno.com (Rex J Maner)
Date: Sat May 1 21:23:29 1999
Some Quacks I have enough trouble copying the info as it is currently sent, What good is all this error correction stuff supposed to mean ? If it ain't broke don't fix it is probably good enuf. Rex K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00013.html (8,233 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu