Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FQP\s+2007\s+results\s+posted\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FQP 2007 results posted! (score: 1)
Author: K1to@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:20:42 EDT
Please visit our Florida QSO Party website at http://www.FloridaQSOParty.org to find the results now posted from the 2007 event. Despite conditions and a few canceled mobile efforts, a number of reco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00207.html (7,856 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FQP 2007 results posted! (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:10:00 -0500
Dan, I was looking over the FLQP rules and was surprised to see the 80m band (nor 160m) is not an operating choice. During the MNQP, over 15% of the contacts are logged on the 80m band. What is the t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00208.html (10,272 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FQP 2007 results posted! (score: 1)
Author: K1to@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:20:26 EDT
Bob - Thanks for your interest and query. This topic was addressed in the 2007 write-up lead which I will repeat below. First, though, one very important difference to note: The FQP does not count Fl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00209.html (9,009 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu