First of all, thanks to everyone who got on for the 2009 Florida QSO Party this past weekend. The early feedback is that activity, and thus many scores, were at record-breaking levels. As some of you
I hear you brother! But we'll not get out of the Cabrillo mess soon, if ever. The biggest thing that I have learned after looking a a whole lot of logs is that any adjustment has to come from my end,
Wow. Clearly, my initial tone came across incorrectly. I am quite happy with Cabrillo. I am also quite happy with the logging programs out there. All I expressed is that we have a few initial growing
I agree with Mike - don't upset your customers. The creativity that hams express in their log files is truly boundless! Gotta be able to deal with it. For fixing files, besides a spreadsheet, there's
The only "issue" the FQP robot had with my CTWIN Cabrillo log submission was: "[X] 'FL-QSO-PARTY' is not the CONTEST: name I was expecting. I am setting it to FCG-FQP." I did not see this as "an issu
Dan, I checked this email when I first saw it and I looked on your web site and I didn't see any place where it actually specified what the Contest name should be in the cabrillo log. Did I miss it?
One things that works, and has become widely used, is to log as follows: W1XX/CTY ie - put the county name at the end of the stations call. This way, dupes and scoring work correctly. If you already
Logging mobiles using the /CTY designator may appear to work fine during the contest, but there are consequences of this logging technique "down the road". The major hurdle is when uploading your log
Bob, This is also a problem using eQSL. It's interesting that LoTW has the option of posting by county, yet the ARRL doesn't have a county based award. Yet, eQSL doesn't have the option and CQ accept