Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT\-857D\s+for\s+contesting\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT\-857D\s+for\s+contesting\?\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:31:09 -0500; Hi Jacob, Congrats from me also. I would say that if it's a question of using an FT-857D that you already have for HF contesting, do it. The operational deficiencies of this radio have been noted by; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00016.html (10,841 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: "Jacob W Tennant" <k8jwt@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:00:44 -0400; Well the 857D question has been put to rest as I had a local offer me a sweet deal on his FT-840 FREE if I help him remove some old antenna tower that is damaged beyond use as well as some other "yar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00018.html (12,485 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: "Jacob Tennant" <k8jwt@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:33:21 -0400; After reading along with the thread on the FT-840 vs. IC-718, I was wondering about the thoughts on using the FT-857D for contesting? I have used one for VHF contestsat a friends station and it seeme; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00569.html (7,299 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:44:02 -0400; Congratulations on earning your General, Jacob! If you have done some VHF contesting in the past and want to try out your new band privileges in some HF contests, of course you can use the FT-857. Is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00573.html (8,634 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: Paul Young <youngp@hp.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:53:27 -0400; I've used an FT-857 with DSP for contesting and DXpedition work, notably the V31QQ/V31XM operation and as a second radio at VP9I. For serious contest operation it has some major deficiencies. The rec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00578.html (8,001 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: "Jacob Tennant" <k8jwt@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:33:21 -0400; After reading along with the thread on the FT-840 vs. IC-718, I was wondering about the thoughts on using the FT-857D for contesting? I have used one for VHF contestsat a friends station and it seeme; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01158.html (7,299 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:44:02 -0400; Congratulations on earning your General, Jacob! If you have done some VHF contesting in the past and want to try out your new band privileges in some HF contests, of course you can use the FT-857. Is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01162.html (8,634 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-857D for contesting??? (score: 1): Author: Paul Young <youngp@hp.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:53:27 -0400; I've used an FT-857 with DSP for contesting and DXpedition work, notably the V31QQ/V31XM operation and as a second radio at VP9I. For serious contest operation it has some major deficiencies. The rec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01167.html (8,001 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]