Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+DR1A\s+Test\s+\&\s+LY0HQ\s+Promo\s+Spam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+DR1A\s+Test\s+\&\s+LY0HQ\s+Promo\s+Spam\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FW: DR1A Test & LY0HQ Promo Spam (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:12:22 -0700; You be the judge. For those who participated in the DR1A on-air CW test in the 20m SSB spectrum (and filled out the form), didn't you find it interesting that a kinda-sorta solicitation to work them; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00082.html (8,479 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: DR1A Test & LY0HQ Promo Spam (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:51:17 -0800; I see no problem with promoting operations prior to the contest. The key word here is prior. They didn't specify any meeting points or how to find them on the bands. In some circles this is called ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00089.html (10,200 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: DR1A Test & LY0HQ Promo Spam (score: 1): Author: Marc Domen <on7ss.oo9o@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:09:28 +0200; I agree with Randy. Posts mentioning activity from HQ stations can also be considered the same way then. I have no problem in advance testing of antennas or station set-up, even mentioning that they; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00092.html (11,875 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: DR1A Test & LY0HQ Promo Spam (score: 1): Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:55:44 +0300; I am not sleeping but testing and coming up to antenna tower. But conditions is very poor this poor this monent. So messages is no very important, only for testing. BTW some ham's can't what we can m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00098.html (9,213 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]