Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FW\:\s+Nov\s+SS\s+op\s+location\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:05:30 -0700
I just received this email. How would you respond? I don't know if this person was in the contest or not. Name removed for privacy. "I 'm going through my logs from the November Phone SS, and I have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00494.html (8,182 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:23:28 EST
Bill K4XS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00507.html (8,854 bytes)

3. Fw: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "k7qq@netzero.com" <k7qq@netzero.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:38:26 GMT
Quack As soon as it is too late to send the logs in, Tell him. Rex -- Forwarded Message -- I just received this email. How would you respond? I don't know if this person was in the contest or not. Na
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00509.html (9,368 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "John WA2GO" <xnewyorka@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:48:02 -0500
My initial thought was to tell him/her that you're sorry, but that this request "seems odd", and that you are a firm believer in the principle that once the contest is over, it is over, and that all
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00511.html (10,846 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Braun" <albraun@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:16:22 -0600
I'd wait until the 30 day deadline for submitting the log has passed, then answer him. Alan Braun NS0B -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com> To: <cq-contest@contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00516.html (9,979 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 14 Dec 2004 08:35:06 -0600
I didn't strike the QSO with the guy who spotted me in the wrong state in the 10-Meter Contest... In both cases (mine and W0MU's) the other guy didn't give you any reason to believe he didn't get you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00522.html (9,778 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:12:19 -0800 (PST)
And what is to stop the guy from going to the ARRL logs submitted page, finding your call, and seeing what section is associated with it. Or looking back through old line scores to see what section y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00530.html (11,508 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:41:25 -0700
Yes unfortunately you can go to the log received page and find out where section the log was submitted for. Me thinks the ARRL should not provide this information. Mike W0MU And what is to stop the g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00533.html (9,527 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:45:40 -0500
Ya know John, that is a very interesting observation. I've noted that ARRL supresses certain info until the deadline for a contest submission has passed - namely the claimed score info. I think that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00534.html (10,175 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:01:16 -0700
I emailed a reply stating that I would be happy to provide the information after the log deadline and that it was outside the rules for me to provide it at this time. He was not the only one that had
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00537.html (9,038 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "John WA2GO" <xnewyorka@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:08:57 -0500
I think that somebody really needs to tell Dan Henderson or whomever is the contest/web guy at ARRLto supress any information that could have been used in the exchange (except for the obvious - the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00547.html (9,803 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:04:24 -0800
I suppose you could tell him to wipe the smudge off his monitor. Either that or scroll the log up or down a line so the smudge is now on top of someone else :-) 73 de Jim Smith VE7FO Mike Fatchett, W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00550.html (9,716 bytes)

13. RE: [CQ-Contest] FW: Nov SS op location (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:36:55 -0500
This is true. Nonetheless, some choose to report the info; others do not. And, the information is not the official data (i.e., you could say for QTH, QTH as Texas). On the other hand, the ARRL inform
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00552.html (10,477 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu