Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Favorite\s+Ploys\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Favorite\s+Ploys\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Favorite Ploys (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:33:24 EST; Time for a new thread name. I still like the old standby of an RST other than 59/5NN. 579 is too easy. To really make it tough use 4NN. Many years ago, when the San Francisco 49ers were a good team t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00591.html (8,322 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Favorite Ploys (score: 1): Author: "Colleen Brakob" <cbrakob@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:03:44 -0700; Radiosport contesting is the only sport I know of where (while striving for a high score ourselves) each competitor has a vested interest in giving a score to the other participant of the moment. As; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00593.html (10,343 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Favorite Ploys (score: 1): Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:09:41 -0500; Actually, in the recent CQ 160 CW test a well known VHFer had a very bad buzz on his signal. I wonder if he really logged the 597 that I sent him and put in my log? K2XA _____________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00595.html (6,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]