Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Feedback\s+on\s+160m\s+Test\s+Log\s+Analyzer\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Feedback\s+on\s+160m\s+Test\s+Log\s+Analyzer\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Feedback on 160m Test Log Analyzer... (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:03:33 -0600; Hello Contesters, I added a feature to the ARRL 160m Log Analyzer and would like some feedback regarding the workbook performance. I added a new worksheet for each log. They list the first 100 callsi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00384.html (8,231 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feedback on 160m Test Log Analyzer... (score: 1): Author: "Steve Lott" <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:54:48 -0600; Bob, while I only played in that contest a little and did not yet, use this log analyzer I wanted to thank you for you work on the logbook tools the ARRL SS version continues to be one of our valued; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00391.html (9,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]