Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Filed\s+Day\s+operations\s+on\s+digital\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Filed Day operations on digital??? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:02:55 -0500
I've had a PSK31 station at field day for the past three years, and it has been very nice for two reasons. First is that there is plenty of activity, at least enough to pick up a fair number of 2 poi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00158.html (7,652 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Filed Day operations on digital??? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:07:33 -0500
Hehe, I know that one! Some folks want to tell you what the color of their laptop is..... 8^) I'm hoping that eventually the psk'ers will shift to PSK63. That should make it about as fast as a CW QSO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00184.html (8,968 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Filed Day operations on digital??? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:01:39 -0600 (CST)
Well, a lot better than VHF/UHF around here! I had a laptop and hooked it up to my TS-440S to make a few PSK31 QSO's last year. On VHF+ I only worked one station on 144/222/432 (the same station) and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00190.html (8,059 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu