Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Follow\-up\s+Line\s+Scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Follow\-up\s+Line\s+Scores\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:23:31 -0000; I am now in receipt of several documents relating to publishing line scores. I only gave them a cursory glance because like any good contester I have antenna wok to do before the contest starts this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00210.html (8,470 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:44:02 -00; If the only reason you're an ARRL member is because you want to see your call letters printed in QST, then perhaps there is no justification for your membership. Join some other national amateur org; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00212.html (8,652 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:45:27 -0800 (PST); I think it would be interesting to find out how many of that 1/3 have actually been on the air in the past year, or been on something other than 2 meter FM or packet (which the ARRL plays to). They p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00213.html (9,919 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:17:35 -0600; There may be a difference between "doesn't want" as in "doesn't care" on the one hand and "wishes for it not to be there" on the other. -- Original Message -- From: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET> To: <c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00214.html (9,434 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:33:54 -0800 (PST); And what would this 1/3 prefer to have in the magazine instead? Another article on how to build a dipole? Another picture of something that says QST or HAM on it? One thing that I did see added was a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00217.html (10,800 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:15:34 -0600 (CST); I've watched QST decline in technical quality over the last few years. It wasn't that long ago that Zack Lau and Rick Campbell were getting microwave trasnverter articles published in QST. I have a f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00220.html (9,160 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 21:19:43 -0000; I just went back and looked it up, the actual captioning on the chart, it is: % wanting less & % wanting more Now Russ if you really want to get a headache the largest % of wanting less was contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00221.html (10,361 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:34:15 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Really? I feel the QUALITY is better than ever. What has changed is the QUANTITY. Go back to the '50s and '60s and QST was full of homebrew s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00222.html (8,874 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Follow-up Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:06:18 -0800; I sigh with you. Then again, back in the 50's and 60's, you could wire some things up point to point, and come away with a pretty cool gadget. Nowadays, everything's composites and surface mount. The; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00223.html (10,231 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]