Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Future\s+for\s+DOS\s+programs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Future\s+for\s+DOS\s+programs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Future for DOS programs (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Sat Jan 17 22:12:39 1998; Trey's note on running CT/TR et al on W95 machines made me a remember a conversation I had just after new years with an associate. The associate is an advocate of DOS, but is now repeating the chilli; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00370.html (7,976 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Future for DOS programs (score: 1): Author: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com (AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com); Date: Sun Jan 18 10:59:56 1998; Dave, There are a few discrepancies in your note. Edit and the DOS shell DO exist in Win95. DOS 7 is most definitely DOS. That is one of the shortcomings of Win95. Microsoft bent over backward to mak; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00381.html (9,741 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Future for DOS programs (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N); Date: Sun Jan 18 22:40:44 1998; << There are WAY too many DOS programs still in use for Microsoft to even THINK about dumping DOS support for a LONG time. Even WinNT runs DOS programs!!! Certainly many of us want to use a common pl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00403.html (7,423 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Future for DOS programs (score: 1): Author: RThompson@factorysoft.com (Randy Thompson); Date: Mon Jan 19 09:05:26 1998; I can suggest an excellent one - WriteLog by W5XD. Check it out at http://www.contesting.com/writelog . I got it to do RTTY contests, but it actually does CW and SSB too! And it runs completely in Wi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00412.html (8,080 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]