Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fwd\:\s+6M\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fwd\:\s+6M\s+CW\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: 6M CW (score: 1): Author: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:35:51 +0000; I want to respond to something AB7E wrote. See "The only differences ..." Yes my HF transceiver may use some digital signal processing. But alleging that's no different from using FTx is *false equiv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-10/msg00105.html (9,097 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: 6M CW (score: 1): Author: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 08:52:14 -0400; Indeed - and I wonder what processor my Drake R-4 is using to decode CW and SSB? Copy by ear vs. computer decoding is *not* "splitting hairs". 73 de Lee, AA4GA _______________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-10/msg00106.html (11,210 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: 6M CW (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:29:34 -0700; Everything I wrote was accurate. It's not a false equivalence. The gripes you (and I) have with FT8 are due to the WSJT-X interface that takes the operator out of the picture ... not the digital pro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-10/msg00110.html (9,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]