Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Going\s+from\s+50\s+to\s+70\s+ft\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Bellas <k9zo@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:17:07 -0500
Folks, I'm beginning to frame up an article for the July/August NCJ "Contesting on a Budget" column. The topic will be to look at the benefits, costs, and considerations associated with raising a tow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00260.html (8,750 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:11:49 -0500
Hi Ralph, This is totally unsubstantiated with any personal "...blood, sweat, & tears" on my part, but I recall reading somewhere years & years ago (the "NCJ", maybe...?) that in order to experience
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00262.html (10,906 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:12:32 -0400
Ralph, You might also solicit the TOWERTALK reflector -Rex  K1HI        Rex Lint       Merrimack, NH Folks, I'm beginning to frame up an article for the July/August NCJ "Contesting on a Budget" colum
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00263.html (9,790 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: "Glenn Wyant" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:44:33 -0400
Made a big difference here going from a 48' Delhi to a 72' Trylon tower ...... After 70' I would not think of any big gain until 100' However that would be on real long haul stuff, 100' might be to h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00264.html (12,809 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:54:26 -0500
An awesome webinar that answers a lot of this can be downloaded and watched from the Potomic guys. http://www.casadelcrappo.com/pvrc/2009-08-05%2020.01%20Contest%20Antennas%20_%20DX%20or%20Domestic_%
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00265.html (13,261 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:14:08 -0500
Don't let that stop ya! I was driving through a local town the other day and came across a station I just could not believe! Check it out what he has on this tiny average suburban sized lot that is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00266.html (8,315 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:26:36 -0400
To get a "real feel" for what will happen at your location, you need to do a HFTA analysis. Terrain plays a HUGE part in what your antenna can and can't do and I've found the models to be pretty accu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00267.html (8,159 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:18:03 -0400
I think that doubling you height thing is one old wives tale that some of the guys on the reflector can speak to. Lots of guys out there now that have the same antenna stacked at 160 ft 100 feet and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00268.html (12,669 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: "KL7RA" <kl7ra@ptialaska.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:25:30 -0800
Yo Ralph I did this very thing for KL7IGZ. On a flat lot it showed it was worth it for his non-contest activity and an improvement for both ten and fifteen meters. But it did a lot more. This was a g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00269.html (9,181 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:55:19 -0500
Tower heights and height of antennas on the Tower are typically band dependant. Antennas are like shoes. One size does not fit all. Increasing your tower height from 50' to 70' might help your signal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00278.html (17,711 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu