Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Handicap\s+For\s+Dirty\s+Rigs\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:59:35 -0500
Dale, yeah but it would be even better if it WERE applied in real-time. Let me join you, thinking outside the box on this topic... the variety of comments got me thinking that it might be possible to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00198.html (20,149 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:27:10 +0700
Great, we have the freq police, the UP police, and now the Rig Police. If I am op within the law, I will be darned if I allow any self appointed Rig Police to dictate my rig choice. Charly -- Charly,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00199.html (11,426 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:43:09 -0700
Hi Stu, As I wrote in TXNoise.pdf, "FCC Rules 97.307 (a) No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than necessary for the information rate and emission type being transmitted, in ac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00200.html (11,755 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:59:59 -0700
Good operators RUN, and they Search and Pounce. When a dirty station wipes out 10 kHz of a band (as KE1B regularly does with a 7600 and legal limit amp 8 miles from me), he deprives me of the station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00201.html (10,840 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:29:57 -0400
You got that right, Bob. The RTTY Skimmer case is simple by comparison. An individual RBN Skimmer may handle 50-60,000 spots during a CQWW weekend. now imagine how much overhead would be required for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00203.html (10,987 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Kevan Nason <knason00@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:45:14 -0400
Jim, You've convinced me about the need to clean up transmitters. So much so that I have no intention of using my FT1000MP MkV Field for much more than casual q's from the work shop and to listen on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00204.html (11,439 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:39:01 -0500
Yes, the SSB skimmer and QoS goals may sound almost impossible to achieve right now, but I recall when President Kennedy said... /"I believe this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00205.html (11,971 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:47:58 -0700
I disagree- signal analysis is certainly possible and won't take that much computer power. It is mostly an issue of coming up with a good algorithm. CW Skimmer for example can remove key clicks from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00206.html (13,375 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:47:24 -0700
I would think that my old TS-450 must be pretty clean because it seems like just about every RTTY contest I get in, I can be CQ'ing and someone will move in right next to me, inside my 250 cycle pass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00208.html (12,780 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem" <george.harlem@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:09:39 -0400
"...As I read the Rules, this puts anyone using them in violation of 97.307 (a)." Yaesu has recently posted new software for the FTdx5000 to "improve the CW keying bandwidth spectrum". I will install
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00209.html (9,535 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:09:30 -0500
I have never heard any complaints about my TS-850. I run it barefoot; no amp here. I just did the capacitor mods - replaced all the caps on the CAR board and the display board (the latter because the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00212.html (13,819 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:37:11 -0700
The LAST thing we would want to do is involve the FCC in this. Far better to police this ourselves. As to checking your own rig -- someone who knows what they are doing can use a P3 connected to the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00213.html (10,539 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu