Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+How\s+Blatant\s+Can\s+You\s+Get\?\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:51:30 -1200
Maybe I could put the Amp in the barn out by the tower then it would be out of sight if someone came by, or do as W6VSS did and put it in a barrel buried in the lawn. (OH he got caught that time) Q _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00179.html (11,807 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:07:08 -0400
Are you kidding me? Do you really think that if someone is determined enough to cheat, they'll stop with such a device? I can think of a few ways to get around this... never mind what, I have no desi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00182.html (21,027 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:58:58 -0500
I think that we have heard enough of these unsubstantiated claims that "those enforcing the rules continue to look the other way". Who is looking the other way and who is cheating? Please present the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00187.html (22,388 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:18:07 -0400
It is been stated a few times, and I agree with it, that the abuse of power can really only be solved by local clubs or operators observing and reporting and pressuring for discontinuance. However, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00188.html (9,631 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:35:50 +0600
Matts, with 59 plus 60 signal no one can sound perfect. Most modern radio have only 30-35 db of IMD on TX. "Linear amps" often make it even worse. If I were on the CC I would allow any power as long
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00191.html (24,239 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: George Vlachopoulos <sv1rp@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Hello, Till now I have read many emails saying, "Power, power, power, power 5KW, power 10KW" and so on. Have you ever thought other ways of cheating?? For example data bases which runs during the con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00197.html (24,574 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy V. Melanyin" <ua3dpx@mail.ru>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:44:08 +0400
Igor, on the one hand you are right about the bandwidth... for i made an expirement in one of the latest contests i worked siriously. Usually i equlize my tx signal well and with the same power i tri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00199.html (26,741 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 02:07:06 +0600
Tom, I fully agree that prevention of excessively wide signals rather then power control is the way to go. What I would argue with is that proving it would be easy. My noise level jumps by 5 S units
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00200.html (12,744 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:09:24 -0400
Igor, I'm not sure it will do much good to apply common sense or careful thought to solving problems. Here are other thoughts: How many people know how to measure real power? I bet most people think
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00201.html (11,745 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 02:11:23 +0600
Andy, Sure I have heard of some operators deliberately making their contest signals wider. I think that should be considered by CC as serious the offence as excessive power or worse. 73, Igor UA9CDC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00202.html (28,850 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:49:35 +0200
Tom's statement below can be verfied by listening to the NCDXF HF Beacons; 10dB does not make a difference. At noise level or in the crud, if you can just hear their 100W carrier, you can still hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00206.html (10,700 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:16:54 -0400
That's a local problem that you and your neighbor can work out. Most people try to fix things as soon as they are aware if them. At a distance though, problems hurt all of us. My point is simple but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00207.html (12,381 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:43:54 +0000
W5OV declared: We have, have we? <snip> http://www.hellocq.net/forum/showthread-t-166667.%E6%AF%94%E8%B5%9B%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97%E6%A3%80%E6%9F%A5%E5%B7%A5%E5%85%B7--SH5.html <snip end of sentence, as t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00210.html (9,946 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: w7dra@juno.com
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:18:39 -0700
I Quote............. "In case of exciter failure, final should still radiate decipherable signal." 4. Neutralization must be accomplished in such a manner that the signal doesn't become too narrow."
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00211.html (9,732 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:34:15 +0600
Mark, contesting is more complicated then that. If both of us call the same multiplier and I am 10 db louder then you, you will have to wait and loose valuable time. Provided all the other variables
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00212.html (11,273 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
They are not equal. Some of us are better ops than others. You can have QRO; I'm still gonna beat you. "More complicated" in a nutshell. Scott W4PA Vibroplex Spiderbeam _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00237.html (8,526 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu