Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IC756PRO\s+vs\s+International\s+Radio\s+filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IC756PRO\s+vs\s+International\s+Radio\s+filters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters (score: 1): Author: 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu (00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu); Date: Thu Mar 9 14:26:32 2000; In conjunction with my earlier post comparing measured specs for a variety of contesting rigs, I offer the following measurements of filter selectivity. The filter measurements for the IC756PRO are f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00112.html (7,579 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Thu Mar 9 14:09:02 2000; I had only a couple of minutes with the PRO at a SCCC club meeting, but found that the narrower (<250) settings of the cw DSP were very usable, with little or no ringing, and the -60 dB points were M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00113.html (8,280 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters (score: 1): Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (bogus@does.not.exist.com); Date: Thu Mar 9 17:49:54 2000; This (sharp :-) operator used factory fresh TS870 with "out of this world" DSP filtering and crapy Kenwood crystal filters in two IFs ahead of it. Rig was just overwhelmed with strong signals and I a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00114.html (8,635 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu Mar 9 20:17:58 2000; The DSP is too late in the sequence to deal with 30 or 40 over signals up or down 300-400 hz (standard ugly situation in the 160 CW tests as example of a really bad case). It needs to be significantl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00118.html (7,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]