Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IRLP\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IRLP\s+Contest\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:02:02 -0000; A quote from the story: "We are trying to promote IRLP as a viable means of communications and also to introduce newcomers to DX IRLP Style." This is not amateur radio. If the ARRL promotes this tec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00244.html (8,825 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:27:52 -0500; I heartily agree ... IRLP and/or Echolink are not, in any way, shape or form, amateur radio. Their promotion by ARRL is a bigger threat to amateur radio than BPL, local tower ordinances, local regula; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00246.html (9,335 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:58:20 EST; to amateur radio than BPL, local tower ordinances, local regulation of RFI, and homeowner associations combined. << and ARRL would not promote real contest - Tesla Cup http://www.computeradio.us/Tesl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00248.html (9,252 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:12:27 EST; Is it true several plaques are being awarded?....by Dell, Microsoft, HP and other new age Ham Radio vendors. ;-) It is obvious the ARRL has the finger on the pulse of 'real' ham radio. Bill K4XS ____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00249.html (8,883 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: Craig Cook <craig.n7or@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:17:54 -0800; Dale is right. As many of you are mis-informed, you need at least a radio to work IRLP. It is ONLY a linking protocol. You CAN NOT work it with just a soundcard and a headset as somebody insisted to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00253.html (10,768 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:29:53 -0500; Craig, IRLP may be ONLY a linking protocol, but I guarantee you I could buy an IRLP "kit" and interface it to a headset and keypad very easily. I would then have a "baseband node" that would permit m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00254.html (11,974 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Sean D.Fleming (K8KHZ)" <sean@k8khz.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:49:34 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time); I agree with Dale to let the contest go on. I only point out that IRLP repeaters might be busy not all repeaters and also that I disagree with the Echolink and IRLP folks calling it DXing when they m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00259.html (10,152 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:58:25 -0000; I'm sorry if you don't believe it, but I have talked to an operator at an irlp node who used a microphone and local speaker that was not going through rf. Maybe this is an exception, but as has been; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00261.html (12,764 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:14:16 -0000; You might also want to look at these: Linking echolink to irlp: http://www.ukirlp.co.uk/ echolink to irlp bridge: http://cqinet.sourceforge.net/thebridge.shtml David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1tt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00263.html (13,883 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:59:45 EST; In a message dated 3/16/05 10:47:52 PM Greenwich Standard Time, craig.n7or@gmail.com writes: The real truth seems to be that you really don't want any newcomers. Keep ridiculing them, calling them "s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00267.html (9,487 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:29:45 -0000; YES! -- Original Message -- From: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com> To: "'Craig Cook'" <craig.n7or@gmail.com> Cc: "'CQ Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>; "'Paul O'Kane'" <pokane@ei5di.com> Sen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00268.html (13,686 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: John Warren <nt5c@texas.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:29:13 -0600; Craig, I'm sorry, but I don't see the connection between IRLP (pro or con) and your conclusion. In our internal club discussion (CTDXCC) we largely agree that IRLP isn't really ham radio "contesting"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00272.html (9,969 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:45:10 -0800; == Whenever I get in my truck and hit the local repeater I try to talk up contesting and HF in general. I am pretty much met with apathy and an attitude that it is better to sit and wallow on a 2 met; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00275.html (9,905 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:56:52 -0800; This is the truth Bill. I have one friend here who I coaxed into taking the 5 WPM code test and get his general. He was really excited when he started talking on HF and last week he passed his Extra.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00280.html (9,909 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Doug Grant" <k1dg@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:57:04 -0000; Ummm...no you're not. Sorry Zack. and "Thunder is good. Thunder is impressive. But it is lightning that does the work." - Mark Twain 73, "Lightning" Doug K1DG All-time Record Holder in the Poisson d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00286.html (9,023 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:29:58 -0500; I was taken to task off the reflector for overreacting to the ARRL's reporting, on a "slow news day" of a release by another group not affiliated with the League. I am concerned about the implication; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00291.html (11,542 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: k8gt@twmi.rr.com; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:40:32 +0000 (GMT); Oh, c'mon Craig. This is ham RADIO. We use radio to make the whole communications link. You can't tell me that you could work VK with a 2 meter rig no matter how big the antenna or amp. Not even by s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00299.html (9,501 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:27:51 -0600 (CST); Heehee ... Did you beat my score in 1996? I thought I'd won it that year. What was your score that year? See... http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/cq-contest/1996-April/006282.html 73, Zack W9SZ _____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00305.html (8,953 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: "Sean D.Fleming (K8KHZ)" <sean@k8khz.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:30:37 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time); I would say that some people are content with VHF/UHF privileges. But, My who problem with this as I state here again is that these Internet users are under the impression that they are true "DXing".; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00306.html (8,837 bytes)
40. Re: [CQ-Contest] IRLP Contest (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:10:43 EST; Contesters and Dxers of all people, should understand the difficulty in protecting amateur access to the spectrum as well as the right to erect a tower sufficiently tall to be effective. Can any of y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00316.html (9,570 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]