Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Icom\s+746\s+as\s+contesting\s+rig\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
How does the Icom 746 do as a contesting rig? I am not interested in things like computer control (or problems with it) since I don't do that, just in basic contesting performance. 73s John W5TD ____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00370.html (6,606 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Mark Ketchell <k5er@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:41:02 -0500
Hi John, Can't speak specifically about contesting w/ the 746, but several in the area have recently purchased this rig and have expressed satisfaction with its performance. I strongly advise you not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00375.html (7,589 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:09:47 +0600
have I think what is more important, logging software shows you dupes and mult. I would not consider rig for contesting without computer interface. 73, Igor UA9CDC on _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00385.html (8,271 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:56:50 +0100
John, IC746 receiver doesn't handle contest band conditions and IM very well. I have owned one for about 4 years and originally bought it for use as radio I recently bought an FT1000 because of the r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00393.html (9,232 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:49:57 -0000
I'm not familiar with the IC746, however I use the TS 870 and it has some problems in contest conditions with IM, That said, it is an excelent contest rig if you will back off on the RF gain and beli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00404.html (10,913 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:36:42 +0000
John, a 746 (non pro, right?) is extremely easy to use with computer control and a contest logging program. You don't have to buy Icom's expesive interface. They can be had for around $40 and work fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00407.html (8,949 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:27:48 EDT
IC746 receiver doesn't handle contest band conditions and IM very well Wow...I just sold my FT-1000MP MKV Field, with the INRAD roofing filter because, to my ears, the 746 handled contest condx, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00416.html (7,884 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:46:27 -0400
Some comments made in response to John W5TD's question were of interest to me. I used a 746 as my only contest radio for four years. I had a pair of INRAD 400hz cw filters in mine as well as an 1800h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00426.html (7,373 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:20:20 -0000
Mike K9MI said: ""2 with rig control, you don't accidentally log on the wrong band"" In this station(n7mal) that is the upper most reason for rig control and the only reason I use rig control during
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00427.html (10,618 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:40:45 +0100
Chuck, Well, I guess that's why there are Kenwoods, Yaesus, Icoms, TenTecs, Hondas, Fords, Chevys and Toyotas. Everyone hears and processes audio differently. I must add here that I prefer the AUDIO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00431.html (9,585 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:55:39 EDT
If you have the space available in your car, IMHO the IC-746 is perhaps the best rig available for mobile contesting. It has an internal antenna tuner with memory for 100 KHz segments, so one can QSY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00434.html (9,267 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:09:16 -0500
Yaesu front panel headphone jacks are useless. Plug your headphones into the external speaker jack on the back panel of the radio through an adapter you can rig up easily. If you have the Yaesu exter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00435.html (10,486 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:24:23 +0100
Jim, You're right on regarding the two antenna ports. I've used that feature during contests like the NAQP to automatically switch signal paths (tribander/ 2 el 40 vs low band wires with tuner, etc)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00436.html (11,303 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:12:09 +0200
Yes in many cases our receivers these days are far too sensetive, i e too low noise floor, usually on the low bands it&acute;s not needed at all. Fixing things with a RX front end attenuator is IMO s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00440.html (8,316 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:23:17 -0500
Our team (PJ4R&TI5N ARRL DX CW 2004-2006) has been using 746PROs. We find the receivers too hot. They act like good contest rigs with some attenuation. Mark, N5OT Yes in many cases our receivers thes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00442.html (7,805 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:36:07 +0000
I'm not totally against a 746 Pro, but I saw all the reviews on EHam and the biggest complaint was transmitter failures. Did Icom get that fixed? Mike - K9MI _________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00461.html (8,314 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:06:58 -0000
Yes 73 Clive GW3NJW I'm not totally against a 746 Pro, but I saw all the reviews on EHam and the biggest complaint was transmitter failures. Did Icom get that fixed? Mike - K9MI Mark Beckwith wrote:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00462.html (9,436 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:12:28 -0500
No, I have consecutive serial numbers later than the trouble period, yet both of mine still failed 3 days apart about 2 months after purchasing them new (June 2004). The factory repaired them at no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00474.html (8,576 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu