Author: Duane - N9DG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 14:56:40 +0000 (UTC)
Perhaps it is time for contest sponsors to rethink contest categories in general based on a yet another recent lengthy thread about assisted vs non-assisted.. They continue to insist upon trying to l
Hi Duane: I strongly disagree with allowing local skimmers, robots, and other similar technological aids in single operator classes - whether locally or remotely located. I propose an alternate guidi
Duane, You have done a good job below, but you have missed maybe the most important point. The electronic submission at the present-The Cabrillo system-and it is a system- contains no multiplier info
Duane, Good thoughts. Beware of unintended consequences. If it goes this way, we will end up with 100 categories in a contest, and it will be meaningless. Let's look at another hobby: Sailboat racing
Author: Duane - N9DG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
I have to admit that HF contesting has never been my cup of tea. I'm just not interested in trying to maintain X Q's / minute run rates for hours at a time in crowded band conditions. I used to be he
Author: Duane - N9DG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:22:30 +0000 (UTC)
In line Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Idea for re-defining categories - long To: "Duane - N9DG" <n9dg@yahoo.com> Cc: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> Date: Saturday, April 9, 2016, 11:53 AM Duane