Now I believe I understand Tree. Is this something like the technology of SO2R?? Since contest rules do not create a new category for SO2R and forced the top operators to adopt it, do you think it m
If you banish the distinction between the two - you have now put the top operators into the position of having to adopt the technology in order to not lose to other top operators who are adopting Tre
When I read the thread title "Get Rid of the Assisted Category" I get a very rosy feeling. But then, the meaning of that phrase has a different meaning to me than it might to the members of the "Assi
... it is the totally wrong conclusion to jump to. The reason that you see typically lower un-assisted scores at the top is simple. The large percentage of the top operators are NOT using assistance.
The top operators pay attention to station and antenna setup. That gives them edge by having better ears/signals, which allows them to work the stuff before the packeteers get to it and the followin
I think the difference between SO2R and packet is that the majority of people think that SO2R technology still leaves just the single operator in the equation. Is it an advantage - yes - but it isn'
Hi Tree Definately a little pistol here. I think maybe the reason that the top op's don't use packet is that they are the beacons on the band. They stay in one spot and CQ for hours and get great rat