Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Interleaving\s+QSO\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Interleaving\s+QSO\'s\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's (score: 1): Author: D Rodman MD <rodman@buffalo.edu>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:23:39 -0400; I wanted to make two points about interleaving QSO's, our latest hot topic, without either endorsing or condemning the practice. First, PJ4G was NOT the originator of this concept. I do not recall, h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00378.html (9,365 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:52:25 -0400 (EDT); Hi David, Your email suggests that you misunderstand the issue. The issue is claiming and defending two frequencies in the same band for interleaved CQs, a practice that was developed and rejected by; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00395.html (9,907 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:46:48 -0700; I think you will find that most of the bigger M/M's run 2 radios on each band with 2 op's. They can interleave on 4 or 5 bands at the same time. Talk about taking up bandwidth :-) 73 Tom W7WHY ______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00401.html (8,115 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's (score: 1): Author: Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:01:12 -0400; I don't think the issue is interleaving qsos, or two radios per band.....Most multis call CQ on one and sp on the other.....I don't think the issue is calling CQ on two bands at once ( interlocked o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00406.html (8,919 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]