Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Inverted\s+Vee\s+Trigonometry\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Inverted\s+Vee\s+Trigonometry\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Inverted Vee Trigonometry (score: 1): Author: "James R. Duffey" <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:23:52 -0700; Sean - This may help. For a 90 degree included angle, that is the angle of the two legs connected to the feedpoin, the inverted vee will have these dimensions: /[\ C / [ \ C / [ h\ / A [ \ Pardon the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00032.html (8,382 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Inverted Vee Trigonometry (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 02 Jan 2005 10:55:16 -0600; I wonder... how badly performance drops off for included angles of less than 90 degrees? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com ____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00035.html (7,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]