Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Is\s+it\s+a\s+time\s+to\s+change\s+rules\s+for\s+HQ\s+stns\s+in\s+IARUcontest\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Is\s+it\s+a\s+time\s+to\s+change\s+rules\s+for\s+HQ\s+stns\s+in\s+IARUcontest\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in IARUcontest ? (score: 1): Author: "Valeri Stefanov" <wally@el-soft.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:28:48 +0300; Dear Fellow Contesters, I would say the time to change rules for HQ stations in IARU contest has come. It is crystal clear ,if one reads the link below( of course, if he can understand Russian :-) ); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00177.html (8,288 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in IARUcontest ? (score: 1): Author: "wally" <wally@el-soft.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:44:47 +0300; Mike, This can not be done the way you are suggesting. If done then for example LZ will have a chance to work many more DLs than DL to work LZ stns. This will make playing field different for LZ vs D; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00185.html (8,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]