Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Is\s+it\s+a\s+time\s+to\s+change\s+rules\s+for\s+HQ\s+stns\s+inIARUcontest\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns inIARUcontest ? (score: 1)
Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:27:55 +0200
To avoid top posting, see comments below... -- Original Message -- ... ... Dear Wally and all concerned As a coincidence, the UBA's team members from OP0HQ were discussing this very same matter only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00183.html (11,295 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns inIARUcontest ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:02:05 -0000
The issue does undermine the credibility & integrity of this IARU event as a contest. It could be addressed by attributing nil points to contacts between HQ and other stations in the territory they r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00192.html (10,228 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns inIARUcontest ? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:27:34 +0200
Wally, You are no normal person, you are a contester ;-)) Perhaps you will find it a fairer competition to work only DX outside the continent as I do? Or is it fair that OX has fewer hams and a poore
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00199.html (8,369 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns inIARUcontest ? (score: 1)
Author: "wally" <wally@el-soft.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:04:27 +0300
I'm afraid this has gone farther than I guessed. I am out of this game :-). No more comments from my side. Wally "Igor, as quite correctly mentioned yourself in your posting on QRZ.RU strategy of DA0
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00232.html (8,668 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu