- 1. [CQ-Contest] Just dreaming (score: 1)
- Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:55:26 -0400
- If the ARRL DX Contest were structured like the Russian DX Contest, the outline would look like this: 7. QSO Points. 7.1 U.S.stations: QSO with your own country (U.S.) - 2 points, QSO with a differen
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00423.html (7,461 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just dreaming (score: 1)
- Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:50:32 +0000
- But then it wouldn't be the arrl dx contest. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00426.html (8,593 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just dreaming (score: 1)
- Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:05:27 +0100
- If qso's with everybody would count it would be yet another cqww contest. On most bands throughout the day I can work easier 4 europeans then 1 NA. So antennas to E-europe and qso-ing? No NA contacts
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00428.html (8,739 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just dreaming (score: 1)
- Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:36:42 -0500
- In other words, just like NAQP except you could work some DX for mults. Not a very appealing format. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00430.html (8,986 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just dreaming (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:56:25 -0700
- So try this: ARRL D/DX CONTEST (ARRL DOMESTIC/DX CONTEST :^) 73. Rick, K6VVA * The Locust ** Annual Crusade to enhance contest rules for more O.F. participation coming soon ** ______________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00431.html (7,431 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu