Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KH7X\s+in\s+AZ\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:23:29 -0700
In SS this weekend, I worked KH7X in AZ.  is it OK (contest rules, legally, morally) not to sign /W7? Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00019.html (6,811 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:07:03 -0500
It is a valid callsign for use in the USA. This would be an issue in a contest like CQ WW where the multiplier status is determined by the callsign. In Sweepstakes, the section is part of the exchang
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00024.html (7,999 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:32:55 -0500
Legally no problem. Hawaii is a state. (Even if some people think it's a part of Kenya). Rules for SS don't address it, but since he is sending his real ARRL section in every exchange, it's not a pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00025.html (8,393 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 09:22:09 -0800
Of course. That's the purpose of sending and copying the exchange! Sometime in the '70s, FCC Rules made all US calls valid anywhere in the US, including territories and possessions, and eliminated th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00026.html (9,576 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:25:29 -0500
The same reasoning could probably be used for NP3X (Not NP2X) operating from VI. Technically they are all US call signs. Another good example is all the one by one K calls (for example K1B in the Bak
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00027.html (9,433 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:56:13 -0500
Legally - legal Morally - hes exchanging AZ so not an issue. Contest rules - not mentioned in ARRL rules (unlike CQ rules) 73 Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest maili
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00028.html (8,130 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:52:00 -0900
I know this isn't a rule, but ..I do think folks who have KH/KL/KP calls should sign /W7 or whatever when they operate from the lower 48. Just seems like a courtesy, and it's what I do when I'm in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00030.html (9,511 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:57:21 -0400
de VE9AA.per below, Steve pretty much hit the nail on the head. KH7X did nothing wrong, legally or against the rules..HOWEVER, it is slightly misleading as you're tuning by as I was..or if I had been
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00033.html (9,045 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:12:12 -0500
Speaking of NP3X, did anyone see the 3830 submission ? He was clearly sending VI as the exchange , but his 3830 says he was in PR .....also look at NP2X, he was sending PR, but his submission says VI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00034.html (10,953 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:16:43 -0500
When its the same DXCC entity, I agree.....but.....I think you have the legal, strict interpretation of the rule, and then the moral or ethical version....I think, and I may be in the minority, that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00035.html (10,188 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:06:53 -0600
The only issue I have had with that station, is not so much where he was, but that there in the past was another station with a very similar call that actually was in HI land. And spots between the t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00036.html (9,699 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:22:47 +0100 (CET)
  Cute.  Over the years KH7X has been on Oahu.  Now you hear it in SS and one get's excited  and  bother to try and work it, and then find out it  is stateside. Anything to get an advantage over a WB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00038.html (11,045 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: Bill Mader <billamader@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:44:57 -0700
When operating from NM (on and off since 1978), I don't use a portable designator except for the three character county abbreviation when operating mobile (roving) for the NMQP. When operating from C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00040.html (11,031 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] KH7X in AZ (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:53:47 -0600
As I have explained to Mike, the statement below is totally incorrect. In Canada a VE9 is in NB, a VE3 is in Ontario, etc. and our prefixes are locked to our Provinces and Territories, however if the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00049.html (8,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu