Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KP4KE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KP4KE\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP4KE (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:00:41 -0500; Sorry, its not KP4XX, its KP4KE. We all know it, so lets stop beating around the bush. In addition to know - beyond physics power excursions - I caught KP4KE spoofing my call on DX Summit and spottin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00152.html (7,708 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP4KE (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:38:06 +0000; Ed, I fully agree on your last statement. If we (the contest community), start doubting the ability and commitment our contest sponsor show to our hobby, then time to consider digging deep for the st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00154.html (9,655 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP4KE (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:12:17 -0400; I'm sorry for beating around the bush by using KP4## I was only trying to make my point while still exhibiting the abundance of caution. The fact that his World QRP record still stands has deprived s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00155.html (8,041 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP4KE (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:44:38 -0600; I have been observing this whole thing as an innocent bystander. I wasn't at the station in question during the contest, so I have no idea what actually happened there. I don't know what the contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00157.html (11,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]