Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KP5\s+Call\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KP5\s+Call\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:54:18 -0600; John, Thanks for your answer. Someone else just informed me they were assigned that call and didn't specifically request it. That must be some new rule a bored bureaucrat created to amuse him/herself; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00265.html (7,607 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1): Author: "wmills" <n7ng4@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:54:22 -0700; David, 73, Wayne, N7NG Jackson Hole John, Thanks for your answer. Someone else just informed me they were assigned that call and didn't specifically request it. That must be some new rule a bored bur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00269.html (8,558 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1): Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:32:11 -0500; Since the FCC doesn't issue KP5 licenses, a KP5 callsign would not be available. This is why K5K was used for Kingman Reef, K4M was used for Midway, K7C was used for Kure, etc., etc. This is not a ne; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00276.html (8,263 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1): Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:07:40 -0600; OK, I was misinformed about the assignment of the Desecheo call. It just happens that the first person that responded to me said it was assigned, or at least I read it that way. There's no "big deal"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00279.html (8,532 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1): Author: Jim Roller <n4ir@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:07:07 -0500; David, My first QSO and QSL from Desecho was for KP4AM/D in 1979, 3 days after it became an official DXCC entity. I can assure you that the excitement was such that I did not care what the call was..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00281.html (7,578 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:40:46 -0600; David, This situation isn't a "new" thing; many expeditions over the past 10-15 years have lacked "appropriate" prefixes. I think a lot of us care, but it isn't in our power to change it here. 73, d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00282.html (7,840 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]