Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Key\s+clicks\s+comment\s+\-\s+CW\s+rise\s+time\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Key\s+clicks\s+comment\s+\-\s+CW\s+rise\s+time\s+question\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Key clicks comment - CW rise time question (score: 1): Author: philip via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 16:25:33 -0400; It is time that severe click offenders be held accountable. This isnt a new issue, plus CW waveform analysis reports are readily available for almost all radios. Such reports often include simple mod; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00131.html (7,848 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key clicks comment - CW rise time question (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 15:59:57 -0700; The only meaningful way to view this data is in the frequency domain, NOT the time domain. In other words, spectra and waterfall. Few lab-quality spectrum analyzers have anything close to sufficient; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00139.html (8,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]