Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Kudos\s+to\s+CQWW\s+Committee\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Kudos\s+to\s+CQWW\s+Committee\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQWW Committee (score: 1): Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:30:07 -0600; I was reading the 2006 CQWW rules in preparation for the SSB contest. A single sentence at the end of rule 5 of the log instructions caught my eye. It did not exist in the 2004 & 2005 rules. "By subm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00262.html (7,002 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQWW Committee (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@k8nd.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:49:24 -0400; Does this mean that *all* CQWW contest QSOs from top stations will no longer be valid for DXCC credit? "5. The presentation in any public forum of logs or other representations of station operation; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00263.html (8,515 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQWW Committee (score: 1): Author: "José Nunes CT1BOH" <ct1boh@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:10:49 +0100; I was told Wayne N7NG said that ARRL is focused on DXpedition logs - not on contest logs. Besides it is a FACT that all of the WRTC stations logs are on LOTW and the logs are public on WRTC site. You; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00268.html (12,222 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQWW Committee (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:37:23 -0400; Fascinating - just a few years ago the position of the CQ Contest Committee was "no way we will ever release a single QSO." Aside from the ARRL issue, I wonder what happened. 73, Pete N4ZR __________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00269.html (9,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]