Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LOGGING\s+cut\s+\#\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LOGGING\s+cut\s+\#\'s\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LOGGING cut #'s (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Fri May 30 10:07:36 1997; hi all, ok now i'm all confused again. (still?) uncle sam taught me to log (record, write down, type) WHAT WAS RECEIVED! (in the best case, that translates to exactly WHAT WAS SENT.) now if the guy s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00336.html (7,432 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] LOGGING cut #'s (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri May 30 19:15:03 1997; BRILLIANT!!! I agreee completely. My logs will reflect what the station SENT. Period. No editorializing for this kid. In the ARRL, I put what the DX stations sends whether it's kw, nnn or whatever. A; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00354.html (7,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]