- 1. [CQ-Contest] LR and LPL spots (score: 1)
- Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ)
- Date: Mon Mar 18 13:12:12 2002
- I have found the spots from both of these stations to be useful and am confused as to why AA4LR does not? We use DX Telnet as the spot sucker for a CT network...I know it has filtering available for
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00345.html (6,864 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] LR and LPL spots (score: 1)
- Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
- Date: Mon Mar 18 15:27:21 2002
- Uh, Jim you mis-interepreted me. I was speaking of spots *OF* K3LR or W3LPL. Not spots of other stations FROM K3LR or W3LPL. In CQWW, I can't work K3LR or W3LPL for credit from the US. (OK, it could
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00346.html (8,145 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] LR and LPL spots (score: 1)
- Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ)
- Date: Mon Mar 18 20:39:19 2002
- I am getting it now.... So, if you had a "domestic"filter option to hide the W spots you would prefer that....and I also gather that you would like to have an option to limit the amount of time a pos
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00349.html (9,725 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu