- 1. [CQ-Contest] Late to the skimmer party (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:48:41 -0700
- Hi all Just got back from a two week vacation, so am late to the skimmer party. Lots of interesting comments - good to see the discussion. Just think back about 20 years ago where the internet didn't
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00565.html (10,116 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Late to the skimmer party (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard L. King" <k5na@ecpi.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:25:23 +0000
- What Tree says pretty well sums up my own feelings about the skimmer. I don't think it is much different, technologically, as the advancement contesters made to two radio contesting. It is still, bas
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00588.html (12,224 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Late to the skimmer party (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:50:26 -0500
- -- That is EXACTLY the sentiment I expressed about so2r 15 years ago. There's been a lot of water under the bridge since then. At least skimmer won't cost $4000 like so2r did. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00594.html (8,133 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Late to the skimmer party (score: 1)
- Author: wd5acr@comcast.net
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:55:01 +0000
- I haven't read the whole thread, so this may be a redundant suggestion, but why not create a fully automated class? Let the ugly bags of mostly water struggle it out, while the superior machines use
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00596.html (14,259 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu