Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Link\s+to\s+proposed\s+changes\s+to\s+ARRL\s+DX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Link\s+to\s+proposed\s+changes\s+to\s+ARRL\s+DX\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Link to proposed changes to ARRL DX (score: 1): Author: "Jim Monahan" <K1PX@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:18:06 -0400; http://www.radio-sport.net/arrldx_rules.htm<http://www.radio-sport.net/arrldx_rules.htm> Jim, K1PX K1PX at msn.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00091.html (6,953 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Link to proposed changes to ARRL DX (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:57:06 -0500; As we've seen in the past, and once again here, you can't always believe what you read or have heard about. (Quote) "Sounds like the rumor mill is way ahead of the actual facts!" Green told radio-spo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00096.html (9,268 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Link to proposed changes to ARRL DX (score: 1): Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:34:35 -0400; I think there is more to it than you give credit for. The CAC undertook the proposal because the ARRL because the ARRL Program Services Committee told them to do so. 73 Rich NN3W ____________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00106.html (11,046 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Link to proposed changes to ARRL DX (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:11:43 -0500; Rich, While we can have respect for the effort the CAC makes, they literally have no ability to do anything other than to advise the BoD (and appointed committees). Their internal discussions are com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00110.html (12,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]