- 1. [CQ-Contest] LoTW - Additional Thoughts.... (score: 1)
- Author: "Dennis Ponsness" <wb0wao@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:09:10 +0000
- I saw the fee schedule and IMHO, it isn't really out of line. I figure that 90%+ of the participants will be US stations so more than likely the major use of credits will be for WAS/VUCC rather than
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00353.html (9,929 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW - Additional Thoughts.... (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:23:32 -0400
- At 04:09 AM 9/30/03 +0000, Dennis Ponsness wrote: I do think that the ARRL may have to "rethink" their policy for DX stations to participate however. I have about 40 Q's out of 3300+ "confirmed" and
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00373.html (10,004 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW - Additional Thoughts.... (score: 1)
- Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 01:28:43 +0000
- Just for information, the Germany database is on the Buckmaster CDROM, as are most of the other countries. I have noticed one irregularity, some G stations have their call listed, followed by "no inf
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00389.html (7,949 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu