Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+Analysis\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+Analysis\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:29:10 +0000 (GMT); I have been looking at some old CQWW CW logs for hints and tips, to discover how some of the top guns operate. In some of them I came across apparantly glaring anomolies which did not accord with my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00354.html (8,647 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:37:42 -0400; Seems to me that several logs are merged here... They DO need an Station Inspector during the Contest over there :) -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - World Wide Rat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00359.html (10,531 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:01:58 -0600; Under the current CQWW rules, that log snippet looks perfectly legitimate. They were CQing on 14099 and doing S&P for the other QSO's. That could have been done with a single radio, with the bandmap; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00360.html (11,432 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:59:08 -0600; If you're questioning the ability to have such a high rate, and be able to intersperse some S&P QSO's..... This is exactly the situation that having a network of SDR receivers placed strategically a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00361.html (9,439 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:08:33 -0500; I think what he's getting at is that it appears the run QSOs on 14.099 and the S&P QSOs on various other frequencies may have been logged on two different computers: Note that the time jumps backward; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00362.html (8,398 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: VK4TI <vk4ti@wia.org.au>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:03:33 -0500 (CDT); The most sensible suggestion seems to be - Do away with M/S as a category and have M2 or MM categories only.. when the rules were formulted for the VK SHIRES contest M2 was the only multi operator ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00366.html (11,472 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:13:49 +0000 (UTC); Hi Trent: I disagree with this. Eliminating the "multiplier" station, and having a 10-minute rule (along, of course, with a single transmitted signal) would create a simpler category that would permi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00369.html (12,191 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:05:39 -0800; Mark I think what your saying is SO2R / or Just SO , leave the Multi to those others to work out. Quack : >) -- ____________________________________________________________ Digital Photography - Clic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00370.html (14,197 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: VK4TI <vk4ti@wia.org.au>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:18:20 -0500 (CDT); which basically says one transmitter and thats it! That I can live with well done Mark Hi Trent: I disagree with this. Eliminating the "multiplier" station, and having a 10-minute rule (along, of cou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00372.html (13,482 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:49:24 -0400; No, I think he's saying that simplifying the Multi-Single to mean SINGLE transmitter -- which I read as no mult station(s), and no octopi or lockouts time-slicing or other gimmicks to try and use two; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00379.html (15,387 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Log Analysis. (score: 1): Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:40:11 -0700 (PDT); If the 10-minute rule creates so much concerns for so many people, why do we need expensive and time-consuming hi-tech solutions when low-tech ones are available? All that is needed is to include th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00391.html (8,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]