Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+Checking\.\s+WPX\s+CW\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+Checking\.\s+WPX\s+CW\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log Checking. WPX CW. (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 11:36:32 +0100 (BST); I got a warning from the Robot of a bad qso. When I look at the line it is just garbage, nothing like a callsign but does have a rcv'd s/n which doesn't look anything like any other qso around that t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00224.html (7,404 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking. WPX CW. (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 19:24:30 +0100 (BST); Hmmnn - I am disappointed about that, still with I don't know how many million q's in all there is little scope for human intervention. It does occur to me though that an op could attempt to avoid a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00254.html (9,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]