Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+MY\s+run\s+freq\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+MY\s+run\s+freq\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:56:58 -0000; I would be interested in opinions: You are operating on 40m and have a good run going. The band just changed and a group guys in another part of the country all of the sudden appears. They have been; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00382.html (6,751 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:30:11 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If I'm the contester I'll move. It's not worth getting into a frequency fight over. On the other hand, if it was a *contester* tryi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00383.html (7,778 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:31:35 -0700; Since there isn't any regulation to govern such a situation, my vote says the one with the better social skills offers to QSY. What's so difficult about that? No wonder ours is a dying hobby ... Dave; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00384.html (7,516 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:26:55 -0600; I would think the best course of action is to have a discussion. Given that it's a 'change-of-propagation' thing rather than an assault on a frequency in use, it's hard to be critical of either side.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00385.html (8,891 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:12:16 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I've heard the decline of ham radio blamed on a lot of things but this is the first time the culprit has been identified as poor "s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00388.html (7,653 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:22:22 -0500; This sounds like a great opportunity to be diplomatic. Maybe you could even change the minds of a few people about those nasty contesters. I'd have a nice chat with them and then move. 73 Steve K0SR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00391.html (7,443 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] MY run freq (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optonline.net; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:36:59 -0500; This reminds me of the Dr. Seuss story: What happens when a North-going Zax meets a South-going Zax on the same road? North-going Zax can only go North. South-going Zax can only go south. Yes, this i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00400.html (8,395 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]