Author: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 01:14:40 +0000 (UTC)
I'm sure I'm way deep in the minority but I'd love to see an automated contest run as an experiment. FT4 could be used as the mode with the appropriate software. Control operators would have to be p
For curiositys sake, I would be interested in a contest where some robots were in the mix, but a contest of only robots would be a giant yawn. 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio I'm sure I'm
Yes, but what would they do? I'll answer that in a minute. There has been a bunch of complaining about FT4 and the automation put into selecting which station to work. I'm sure the authors saw the 6
Tom, Great ideas. Run as an FT4 only contest - its wonderful. Ed N1UR Yes, but what would they do? I'll answer that in a minute. There has been a bunch of complaining about FT4 and the automation put
An interesting thought. FT# modes produce QSOs that comply with FCC Rule 97.119 a. while typical CW or SSB QSOs do not.Quoted below. *§97.119 Station identification.* (a) Each amateur station, except
You need to show the FCC's definition of "communication" before you can make that statement. John KK9A An interesting thought. FT# modes produce QSOs that comply with FCC Rule 97.119 a. while typical
Hello, John. Not sure where you are going with your statement. These are the "Plain English" rules and the FCC does not specifically define communication, except for the items outlined in 97.111 thru