Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+More\s+Cheating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+More\s+Cheating\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:39:37 -0600; Is cheating more common than anyone wishes to admit? Is it time to take a reality check and acknowledge that cheating is a big problem instead of down playing (head in sand) the possibility? Quote fr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00252.html (7,224 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:09:58 +0100; It seems to me that remote control operation, however challenging it may be technically - or as a legitimate pursuit in its own right, is incompatible with amateurradio award chasing and contesting.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00255.html (7,647 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:32:57 -0600; The article was about DXing, not contesting. Please, let's not start a discussion about cheating by DXers on this contesting reflector. There are many more appropriate forums for this. 73, Steve, N2I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00256.html (9,018 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:02:02 -0400; Some will always cheat, regardless. Some will "push the envelope" trying to bend -- but not break -- the rules as much as possible. Whether or not this is technically considered "cheating" might depe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00258.html (10,829 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:35:53 -0600; There are always those who believe that by ignoring a problem, the problem will go away. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Part of the article was about cheating in a DX column, not about DXi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00271.html (8,190 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:19:28 +0200; I feel quite comfortable operating my station remote from the shack in my living room from time to time. Before using TRX-Manager I was using wireless microphone and headset which did not allow to qs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00273.html (8,967 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:45:06 -0600; There are always those who believe that by ignoring a problem, the problem will go away. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Part of the article was about cheating in a DX column, not about DXi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00282.html (8,161 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:24:14 -0500; Actually I find it hard to understand that no one has mentioned that this is not cheating, this is illegal operation. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when ever; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00286.html (9,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]