Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multi\s+Op\s+Single\s+transmitter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multi\s+Op\s+Single\s+transmitter\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Multi Op Single transmitter (score: 1): Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:50:38 -0500; Dear OMs, Is it within the spirit of the classification for a Multi-Single station to have multiple S&P stations all manned and operational at the same time. This seems to me to be approaching a Mult; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00380.html (7,167 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi Op Single transmitter (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:55:56 -0700; All is fair as long as the rules are followed. Organizers have put in band change limits per hour or 10 minute timers etc to cut back on the effectiveness of essentially being M/M but classifying dow; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00391.html (8,232 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]