- 1. [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: "fabio.grisafi@libero.it" <fabio.grisafi@libero.it>
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 10:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
- This is a message I have sent to WRTC Director explaining the Red Card. I send this email to all the community because I wish everybody understands that I am not a cheater. John 8:7: "He that is with
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00163.html (20,947 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Grant <dougk1dg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:00:58 -0400
- Hello, Fabio - Thank you for your email. I received your direct email yesterday morning, and was unable to respond immediately. I see that you have now chosen to air this issue publicly on CQ-Contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00172.html (10,035 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: "Braco OE1EMS" <oe1ems@emssolutions.at>
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 21:24:12 +0200
- Anyway this kind rule was used all ready for WRTC 2006 in Brasil and it was called "WRTC Code of ethic" it was not published in WRTC rules but some of TL were not able to participate since they were
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00174.html (11,455 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: "Toivo Hallikivi" <toivo.hallikivi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:14 +0300
- Hello, Without referring to any of the particular cases mentioned in this discussion I must say I'm a little concerned about the collective punishment aspect of the CQWW and CQWPX rules about the Red
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00209.html (8,487 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: Luc Moreira <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:41:12 -0300
- As soon as two or more Ops decided to go as Mult-Op, it isn't anymore a bunch of Single-Op using same callsign, but a team. If someone screw up during contest, whole team is responsible. There is no
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00212.html (8,534 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:03:39 -0400 (EDT)
- However, he was the one who changed the logs. That is an individual action and qualifies for a red card. Bill K4XS/KH7XS In a message dated 4/10/2013 3:25:16 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time, toivo.ha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00213.html (9,082 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:16:38 +0200
- Hi Guys, This is a good starting point. Same question was raised to the CC Director, and the answer is in the rules, the rule is very clear. The RC/YC will apply to all operators. They do this becaus
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00219.html (11,374 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:23:32 +0600
- Hi Toivo, If your suggested approach is adopted (punish only one member of a team), then every team will have a "scapegoat" in case they need to avoid RC or YC for all the team members. I do not thin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00220.html (10,599 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
- Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:54:11 -0500
- I am not speaking on behalf of the CQWW Committee here - and for further reference, unless it is specifically stated, no members of the CQWW Committee may speak *officially* for the Committee except
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00221.html (10,888 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu