- 1. [CQ-Contest] N2RM packetless M/2 details (score: 1)
- Author: kz2s@hiway1.exit109.com (John Golomb)
- Date: Wed Feb 20 12:15:38 2002
- Why did we do it? -- I've wanted to do this for quite some time now. There has been quite a bit of discussion the past few years about how multioperator contesting has been somewhat tarnished by the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00300.html (13,219 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] N2RM packetless M/2 details (score: 1)
- Author: n4af@contesting.com (Howard Hoyt)
- Date: Wed Feb 20 21:37:20 2002
- My hat is off to the crew at N2RM. Hmm, trying to decide which is lower, packet dx or SPAM ??? - a tough one. Perhaps we need a new category for Multi/2 or M/M : UA ? -- Howard Hoyt N4AF http://www.q
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00309.html (7,058 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] N2RM packetless M/2 details (score: 1)
- Author: n6tj@sbcglobal.net (James Neiger)
- Date: Wed Feb 20 13:45:02 2002
- Congratulations, John, to you and the N2RM crew for showing the way. Let's hope it sticks............... Vy 73 Jim Neiger N6TJ -- Original Message -- From: "John Golomb" <kz2s@hiway1.exit109.com> To:
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00310.html (15,366 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] N2RM packetless M/2 details (score: 1)
- Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP)
- Date: Wed Feb 20 23:36:18 2002
- <snip> ==> John, It seems to me your team is REALLY back to doing what radio sport is all about. I remember being on Hainan Island a few years ago and watching the Chinese get fish with dynamite. Got
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00332.html (9,537 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] N2RM packetless M/2 details (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Thu Feb 21 10:27:47 2002
- This brought up something I found a little interesting this year. Using a year-old master.dta file (not the one that K8CC et al have built from scratch), I found it of relatively little use in tellin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00333.html (8,119 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu