Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+Categories\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+Categories\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:21:39 -0500; With all the discussion going on about big gun vs little guns, guest operators etc.. in NAQP has anyone ever thought of incorporating a tribander/wires class into the the contest rules. It seems like; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00299.html (6,494 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: "K5ZM" <k5zm@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:35:44 -0800; Do that, and NA loses it's unique appeal. (IMO, YMMV) It becomes 'just another contest' with very little to differentiate it from all the other domestic tests. 'zm -- www.k5zm.com operators class It; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00300.html (8,070 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 9:19:25 -0500; "Do that, and NA loses it's unique appeal. (IMO, YMMV) It becomes 'just another contest' with very little to differentiate it from all the other domestic tests. " What's so unique about NAQP ??? The; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00308.html (7,773 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: Scott Stembaugh <radio.n9ljx@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:25:42 -0500; I agree. With my very modest setup it is nice to be able to find a frequency lower that xx.050 to try and run a little and not have to fight the alligators. 73, --scott -- -- N9LJX radio.n9ljx@gmail.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00309.html (9,349 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: Richard DiDonna <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:59:28 -0500; How much simpler could NAQP be? 100 watts and no multi-multi machines to contend with. I broke into the top 10 last year with a single OB16 at 80 feet one one tower and a C3E on second tower at 60 fe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00320.html (9,064 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:51:57 -0500; NO! Absolutely not! Allowing High power in the NAQP would ruin, spoil and destroy its character. NAQP is a low power contest. The rules clearly state that you cannot run an external amplifier, and yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00585.html (8,356 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:57:16 -0500; 1) It's low power only. 2) It's only 12 hours long. (Family friendly) 3) Six bands in a domestic contest. (except for RTTY) 4) Multipliers count per band, so there's strategy. 5) Exchange is super-ea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00586.html (8,061 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]