Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+Skimmer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP Skimmer (score: 1): Author: "rob beaudoin" <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:19:20 -0600; Count me as one of those that strongly disagree with alowing Skimmer. It really gives me a bad feeling about competing in one my favorite contest. I have organized the team competition for ACG for 4; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00336.html (7,283 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Skimmer (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:55:12 -0700; I believe that I have pretty much wrapped around the changes... up to the point of somewhat understanding just exactly what it is that folks will be doing... and how it will change the playing field.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00350.html (9,103 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Skimmer (score: 1): Author: Owner1 <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:34:21 -0600; As much as I celebrate the achievement of VE3NEA and his Skimmer for the assisted classes, I too am at a loss to understand why this is considered an acceptable rule for unassisted. How is skimmer di; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00358.html (11,599 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Skimmer (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:58:03 -0500; Count me as one of those who strongly disagree with allowing : 1. Use of anything but a 2 tube regenerative receiver 2. Use a computer logging. 3. use of more than 10 watts output power 4. Use of any; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00359.html (8,367 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]