Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NIL\s+\=\s+Not\s+In\s+Log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NIL\s+\=\s+Not\s+In\s+Log\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 07:22:37 -0600; Hello contest operators, Time for a reminder post about NILs. (NIL = Not In Log). I had the sad experience in the SS contest of answering a CQ and having the op tell me we had worked before. Now to s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00338.html (8,519 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 08:41:50 -0600 (CST); When the band becomes really packed, I always send the callsign of the station I'm replying to before I send my call (well, I actually do it all the time in SS anyway). Alas, others don't all do that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00340.html (10,395 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 07:39:37 -0800; Yes, I too am astounded when another station sends a "QSO B4" message. I don't understand why anyone even has that message programmed in their software. I'm even more astounded when they persist afte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00346.html (11,225 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:18:03 -0500; -- I had one of them ..... almost. I'm CQing. A station a bit off frequency drops his call. I send a "?" and he sends his call again, so I hit the insert key, sending his call and my exchange. And co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00353.html (8,295 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:55:33 -0600; What I do is complete the exchange, log it, and then let them know that it is a possible dup. Quite often I am logged as VE5 instead of VA5. Doug Yes, I too am astounded when another station sends a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00356.html (8,766 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:44:03 -0500; NIL happens for two reasons: 1. On either CW or SSB the timing is right so you log K4 bla bla and the other station logs W9 three letter. 2. On SSB (especially on 40 split) you are working stations (; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00364.html (8,288 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:47:06 -0600; Personally I am not rate driven. I am accuracy driven. I take pride that I achieve low UBN numbers. So the "correct" action with a QSO B4 response is influenced by your personal contesting goals. It; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00365.html (13,578 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 21:08:48 -0700; I find it even more ludicruous, when I get a "QSO B4" message from a fellow running in the 1200 or more Q range, and I have less than 100. I could do a dupe check faster on paper than he can with a p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00368.html (9,179 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]