Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+No\s+DX\s+Summit\s+spots\s+for\s+18\s+February\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+No\s+DX\s+Summit\s+spots\s+for\s+18\s+February\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] No DX Summit spots for 18 February! (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:30:01 -0800 (PST); I was looking at the spots on DX Summit: http://oh2aq.kolumbus.com/dxs/ and noticed that there are NO spots for 18 February (Saturday of ARRL DX). So if you try to search for something you might have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00228.html (7,288 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] No DX Summit spots for 18 February! (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:18:18 -0000; It was also down for much of Sunday I think. At least I couldn't access it or grab the inputs page for analysis, and very little was getting through to the #cqdx irc channel. If anyone is relying on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00233.html (9,125 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] No DX Summit spots for 18 February! (score: 1): Author: "Simon Brown (HB9DRV)" <simon@hb9drv.ch>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:21:21 +0100; I noticed that the DX Clusters such as OH2AQ (and my own) were being hit much harder than normal over the weekend. I had almost 4,000 simultaneous connections at one time to the web service, whereas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00247.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]