Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+North\s+American\s+QSO\s+Party\,\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+North\s+American\s+QSO\s+Party\,\s+CW\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] North American QSO Party, CW (score: 1): Author: Steef <steefpa3s@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:46:44 +0100; Hello you all, This weekend I wanted to participate in the North American QSO Party, CW. For the triple play WAS on LoTW I only need South Dakota in CW, so I was hoping to find some one for that miss; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00075.html (7,416 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] North American QSO Party, CW (score: 1): Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:25:02 -0800; I would have worked you... especially since you're worth the same points as someone in NA. It could have been that your signal wasn't making it through the QRM or a mis-understanding of how to log yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00077.html (8,504 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] North American QSO Party, CW (score: 1): Author: <mike@n1ta.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:53:49 -0700; _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00078.html (6,735 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] North American QSO Party, CW (score: 1): Author: <mike@n1ta.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:50:44 -0700; Hi Steef, It is likely the ops just didn't understand they could work you. I worked quite a few EU; there was even a pretty loud F5 calling CQ NA. I talked to my neighbor after the contest and he did; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00079.html (8,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]