Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Nostalgia\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Nostalgia\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: CP2235@aol.com (CP2235@aol.com); Date: Sat Dec 19 10:12:17 1998; << Things are moving fast, folks, and the next step is to confirm and validate our contacts by electronic means on-line, even if we still make them by radio. (Cf. Oscar, CO2OJ's comment recently) I t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00163.html (9,916 bytes)
2. SV: [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: tjanste@algonet.se (Goran Fagerstrom); Date: Sun Dec 20 22:12:43 1998; <cut> Con: I will keep this brief, but the subject of more modern forms of QSL-ing does have bearing for contesters, with the volumes of contacts we make. And the fact that it is so much speedier. F; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00172.html (9,265 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: dieven@msn.com (Dick Dievendorff); Date: Tue Dec 22 10:14:35 1998; Does the ARRL DXCC desk accept your cards? That's the main issue for a lot of folks. I don't care where the card comes from or what it looks like if it's acceptable to Newington for my award. At the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00193.html (7,853 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Dec 23 16:40:37 1998; If the ARRL would accept electronic cards, it would be a lot easier on people on fixed incomes too. Take the basic 5BDXCC award. That takes 500 cards. Figure at least $1.00 for each card. Now there a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00202.html (7,650 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: pk@ij.net (Paul E. Knupke, Jr.); Date: Wed Dec 23 13:04:29 1998; I can understand teh reluctance to allow electronic QSL cards but the fact that postage rates keep increasing and thus QSL bureau rates also rise there needs to be a serious examination of accepting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00203.html (8,327 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: meg@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Ed Goss); Date: Wed Dec 23 14:25:32 1998; Tom, Many years ago I proposed a new "contest" to the League. It had the express purpose of allowing the participant to qualify for (in the case of my proposal) WAS or 5BWAS without the need to send/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00204.html (9,745 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: K8KFJ@aol.com (K8KFJ@aol.com); Date: Wed Dec 23 18:11:27 1998; Paul, there is one way that electronic QSLing could work...that is if everyone obtained a strong encryption program such as PGP (it's free) which generates both a Secret Key and a Public Key. You can; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00207.html (8,194 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@geocities.com (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Thu Dec 24 00:29:32 1998; Wouldn´t say impossible (maybe some DXer works for NSA...) but it´s harder to break PGP code than fake a piece of paper. Ernesto Grueneberg - LU5CW (ex LU2BRG & LU6BEG) < mailto:lu5cw@ge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00208.html (8,266 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]