Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+On\s+Line\s+QSL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+On\s+Line\s+QSL\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] On Line QSL (score: 1): Author: Carl Brockman <n6ar@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:46:58 -0800; Guys, I read with interest all the criticisms of e-Qsl. All the comments about double blind being needed are baloney. Its not the 2 m fm Qsl with an I4 thats a problem, but the false paper Qsls with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00087.html (7,923 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] On Line QSL (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 15:25:00 -0600; Then there was the VE5 that posted that anyone who needs a contact to email him the freq, mode and time and he would enter a Q there. -- Jim K0XU jim@rhodesend.net ___________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00088.html (9,133 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] On Line QSL (score: 1): Author: Carl Brockman <n6ar@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 13:51:32 -0800; And he could do the same thing with LOTW! Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00089.html (9,474 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]